Time left : XX : XX
English Typing Paragraph
The political adventurists in parties like AAP, TMC and the like only look for a political opportunity in these groups. These human right organisations are an over-ground face of the underground. In
the system that they believe in, there is no place for life, liberty, equality and free speech. In fact, there is no space for election or Parliamentary democracy. Ultimately what every
Indian is concerned with is who can hold this country together? Of course, an elected Government, a dialogue with the people, a humane approach with the average Kashmiri is the ultimate
object of the Indian-State which few can disagree. But it is paramount to protect India's sovereignty and the right to life of its citizens. At times we get caught in the
idioms that we create. One such phrase is "muscular policy-in Kashmir". To deal with a killer is also a law and order issue. It can't wait for a political solution. Fidayeen
is willing to die. He is also willing to kill. Should he be dealt with by offering Satyagraha before him? When he advances to kill, should the security forces that confront
him, ask him to sit-on a table and have a dialogue with them. A policy, therefore, has to protect the ordinary-citizen of the valley; get him freedom from the terror; provide
him with a better quality of life and environment. A terrorist who refuses to surrender and refuses a ceasefire offer has to be dealt with as anybody taking law in his
own hand. This is not 'muscular'. It is the rule of law. Let one fact be clear. The Maoist sponsored human rights organisations only espouse the cause of separatism and violence
- be it Kashmir or Chhattisgarh. They have brought a bad name to a very precious and valuable concept of human rights. Their international affiliates are no different. Our policy has
the system that they believe in, there is no place for life, liberty, equality and free speech. In fact, there is no space for election or Parliamentary democracy. Ultimately what every
Indian is concerned with is who can hold this country together? Of course, an elected Government, a dialogue with the people, a humane approach with the average Kashmiri is the ultimate
object of the Indian-State which few can disagree. But it is paramount to protect India's sovereignty and the right to life of its citizens. At times we get caught in the
idioms that we create. One such phrase is "muscular policy-in Kashmir". To deal with a killer is also a law and order issue. It can't wait for a political solution. Fidayeen
is willing to die. He is also willing to kill. Should he be dealt with by offering Satyagraha before him? When he advances to kill, should the security forces that confront
him, ask him to sit-on a table and have a dialogue with them. A policy, therefore, has to protect the ordinary-citizen of the valley; get him freedom from the terror; provide
him with a better quality of life and environment. A terrorist who refuses to surrender and refuses a ceasefire offer has to be dealt with as anybody taking law in his
own hand. This is not 'muscular'. It is the rule of law. Let one fact be clear. The Maoist sponsored human rights organisations only espouse the cause of separatism and violence
- be it Kashmir or Chhattisgarh. They have brought a bad name to a very precious and valuable concept of human rights. Their international affiliates are no different. Our policy has
Note: UseDown,Enter,PageDown for Next Chunk, Use PageUp for Previous Chunk
Chunk Number: 1